TransCanada Corporation KEYSTONE XL START-UP PUSHED OUT;

Keystone XL demonstration, White House,8-23-20...

Keystone XL demonstration, White House,8-23-2011 Photo Credit: Josh Lopez (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

TRP : TSX : C$49.14
TRP : NYSE
HOLD 
Target: C$51.00

COMPANY DESCRIPTION:
TransCanada is a North American energy infrastructure company. Its gas pipeline network spans approximately 68,500 km across North America. The company has ~380 Bcf of gas storage capacity and owns or has interest in over 10,900 MW of power generation in Canada and the US. The company also owns the 3,460 km Keystone Pipeline system which began deliveries in 2011 to Cushing, Oklahoma from Hardisty, Alberta

 

Investment recommendation


TransCanada reported first quarter recurring earnings of $0.50 per share, below the $0.53 consensus and our $0.55 expectation. Earnings per share were negatively impacted by lower than expected availability at Bruce Power, lower hedge prices on Alberta production, and continued throughput decline on the U.S. natural gas pipeline systems. These negative issues were offset by recording a higher allowed ROE (11.5% versus 8.08% last year) on the Mainline, which added about $0.03 to Q1/13 EPS. Importantly, given the company’s revised outlook on the timing of a U.S. Department of State decision for Keystone XL, management has shifted the expected start-up date for the project to the second half of 2015 (versus late 2014/early 2015 previously). With timing delays, the company expects its capital costs for the project to escalate from its current estimate of $5.3 billion, although management will not provide any details on the magnitude of potential cost increases until it receives U.S. Department of State approval for the project.

Valuation

Our 12-month target is derived from a combination of valuation metrics, including earnings and dividend yields relative to long-term interest rates, a dividend discount model, and earnings multiples relative to its energy utility peers. We value the company on the longer-term potential of existing assets and projects under construction. We note that there is the potential for upside to our target price once more certainty is provided surrounding the timing and likelihood of an approval for the cross-border section of Keystone XL. We also incorporate an approximate 100 basis point increase for our estimate of the future long-term Government of Canada bond yield.

Americas’ Growing Oil Production – Glut May Drive Prices to $ 50

King Abdullah ibn Abdul Aziz in 2002

King Abdullah ibn Abdul Aziz in 2002 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

( still the U.S. imports 8 million barrels a day)

The U.S. expanded its oil production this year by the most since the first commercial well was drilled in 1859, upending a belief that Americans were increasingly hooked on foreign crude.

Domestic output grew by a record 766,000 barrels a day to the highest level in 15 years, government data show, putting the nation on pace to surpass Saudi Arabia as the world’s largest producer by 2020. Net petroleum imports have fallen by more than 38 percent since the 2005 peak and now account for 41 percent of demand, down from 60 percent seven years ago, moving the U.S. closer to energy independence than it has been in decades.

Seven years after President George W. Bush declared “America is addicted to oil, much of which is imported from unstable parts of the world,” the country has so much crude that it was able to join Europe in choking off exports from Iran without pushing U.S. benchmark prices over $100 a barrel. And refining capacity helped make the U.S. the world’s largest fuel supplier. Even in Venezuela, where Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM)’s assets were seized, more and more cars run on gasoline made in America.

“The U.S. has a huge lead in the 21st century in maintaining its superpower status,” said Ed Morse, global head of commodities research at Citigroup Inc. in New York. “There was absolutely no way to anticipate the level of growth in the oil supply.”

Faster, Cheaper

America’s latest oil rush was spurred by new technology that has made drilling faster, cheaper and better at unleashing oil from rock formations, even as it has raised alarms among environmentalists about the potential danger to drinking-water supplies and intensifying greenhouse-gas emissions.

Producers, eager to profit from prices that have remained above $75 for more than two years, deployed as many as 1,432 rigs, the most in records going back to 1987. Trucks bearing pipe traversed Wyoming’s high desert plains and Oklahoma’s back highways, geologists pored over well logs from Colorado to New Mexico, and landmen trying to secure mineral rights crowded into courthouse record rooms from North Dakota to the Gulf Coast.

The U.S. will produce an average of 6.41 million barrels a day this year, a 14 percent increase from 2011, according to a Dec. 11 report from the Department of Energy. It’s the biggest annual gain in the number of barrels since the industry began when Pennsylvania’s Drake well ignited the first American oil rush in 1859, department data show. Saudi Arabia pumped 9.7 million barrels a day in November, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The Paris-based International Energy Agency said last month the U.S. is on track to become the top producer in about eight years.

‘New Thing’

“The shale oil revolution is a new, new thing,” said Francisco Blanch, the head of commodities research for Bank of America Merrill Lynch in New York. “It has come out of nowhere in the last year and a half.”

The nation’s stockpiles increased by a record 13 percent this year, and U.S. refiners are paying less for crude than much of the rest of the world. Landlocked by export restrictions and limited transportation, the glut of U.S. light, sweet crude — cheaper to process than the high-sulfur, sour grades pumped by Saudi Arabia and Venezuela — pushed domestic prices down to as much as $28 a barrel less than Brent, the European blend that sets prices for more than half the globe’s oil.

That discount handed Gulf Coast refiners an advantage over competitors and helped the U.S. become a net fuel exporter last year for the first time since 1949, surpassing Russia as the world’s largest. Venezuela quintupled its imports from the U.S. this year to a record 196,000 barrels a day in September, according to Energy Department data.

Global Clout

Rising output from the U.S. has also increased the nation’s sway in the global market by forcing the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries into an unpalatable choice: Increase production to bring prices down and maintain market share; or keep prices high to sustain state spending, and thereby subsidize the competition from U.S. producers, which can provide crude to domestic refineries at a lower price.

The unprecedented gains came so quickly that the industry is rushing to regroup. The 500-mile Seaway pipeline, which was reversed last year and now carries U.S. crude south to Gulf Coast refineries instead of moving imports north, will expand to 400,000 barrels a day as early next year from 150,000 now.

Northeastern fuel makers, on the verge of insolvency a year ago, have begun replacing foreign cargoes shipped by tanker from Africa, Europe and the Middle East with cheaper domestic oil brought in by rail. A pipeline shortage has boosted profits at tank-car maker American Railcar Industries Inc. and at BNSF Railway Co., owned by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

Exports Limited

Even if there were enough pipelines to carry more crude from swelling storage hubs to the coasts, oil exports are limited by rules imposed by Congress following the 1973 Arab oil embargo.

Exports may be necessary to avert a surplus that would depress prices and discourage drilling, said Bank of America’s Blanch. West Texas Intermediate oil, the U.S. benchmark contract, could fall to as low as $50 a barrel within the next two years unless the rules are eased to relieve the glut, he said. Until prices drop, it may be difficult for politicians to persuade the American public to allow expanded exports.

“What I see is basically an inability to go out and explain to the public that we have to change the rules before the prices give us the signal,” Blanch said. “If you’re in the White House, why are you going to change the crude-export rules that the U.S. has right now when the country is still importing 8 million barrels a day of oil?”

Forestalling Glut

At least one member of the Obama administration has begun making the case that the U.S. is building toward a crippling surplus. Adam Sieminski, head of the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the statistical arm of the Energy Department, said limited transactions with other countries may help forestall excess supplies that could undermine prices and hobble the industry.

“That’s going to be a policy decision of the Congress and the administration,” Sieminski said. “It’s just a question of what the economics are.”

The surge in oil output, coupled with record natural gas production, allowed the U.S. to meet 83 percent of its own energy needs in the first eight months of 2012, on track to be the highest since 1991, Energy Department data show. The last time self-sufficiency was achieved was in 1952. While the U.S. still imported some petroleum then, exports such as coal more than offset foreign cargoes.

Overseas Shocks

That interconnectedness means U.S. consumers will still be vulnerable to supply shocks overseas, Sieminski said. An Energy Department forecast shows the country will import 10 percent of its needs in 2035. That doesn’t account for slowdowns because of new regulations, which may tighten because drilling has been linked to groundwater pollution and earthquakes, he said.

Then there’s the problem of how burning all these fossil fuels may contribute to climate change, said Anthony Swift, an attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council in Washington.

“There’s a real environmental cost to investing billions of dollars in new sources of carbon-intensive fuels when we know we really need to be investing in clean energy,” Swift said. “It’s better for our environment, better for our economy and better for energy security.”

Tightened automobile-mileage requirements helped reduce consumption of petroleum products by 16 percent through September since peaking in August 2005, a drop of 3.5 million barrels a day, Energy Department data show.

Dakota Boom

The U.S. oil boom began in 2004 with a North Dakota well completed by Continental Resources Inc., which confirmed that a combination of two technologies could unlock profitable amounts of crude in pockets deep underground.

Continental paired horizontal drilling, in which the well is bored at an angle to run lengthwise along the richest slice of rock, with hydraulic fracturing. Better known as fracking, the process forces a high-pressure stream of sand, water and chemicals underground to crack apart the rock and free the crude. Since then, North Dakota’s oil production has increased to 728,000 barrels a day, surpassing Ecuador, an OPEC member.

Harold Hamm, Continental’s founder and chief executive officer, has called for expanding U.S. production. The company estimates the Bakken and other formations under North Dakota contain the equivalent of 27 billion to 45 billion recoverable barrels of oil. By comparison, Nigeria has an estimated 37.2 billion barrels of proven reserves, according to OPEC.

Wildcatters Compete

Hamm’s success set in motion an oil rush that spread across the U.S. as wildcatters competed to be first to new prospects. Chesapeake Energy Corp. made a deal in early 2007 to buy a million acres of Wyoming’s Powder River Basin, near the Teapot Dome formation that gave its name to the notorious bribery scandal of the 1920s.

Exploration intensified in Oklahoma’s Mississippi Lime, the Eagle Ford Shale in Texas, Ohio’s Utica formation, Louisiana’s Tuscaloosa Marine shale and New Mexico’s Bone Springs.

Competition grew heated as oil prices above $75 encouraged more drilling. In one Wyoming courthouse, the county clerk brandished a cattle whip to keep order among the crowds of landmen packing in to research mineral rights. Joe Thames, a Denver-based contract lease buyer who has worked for companies such as Chesapeake, said rivals once followed his best landman from his motel to try and find out where he was buying.

‘Big Gamble’

When results of EOG Resources Inc. (EOG) 2009 Jake well in northeastern Colorado leaked, lease prices quintupled in less than two months, said Bob Coskey, a Denver geologist. That play, called the Niobrara, turned out to be smaller than people thought, Coskey said. Overnight, acreage outside the best zones became almost worthless.

Hanging over this activity is the specter of past busts. The last boom in the late-1970s came crashing to a halt in 1985 when Saudi Arabia, in an effort to regain declining market share, flooded the world with crude and sent prices to $10 a barrel in 1986. U.S. production fell for 21 of the next 22 years.

“It’s a big gamble,” said Mike McDonald, an Oklahoma wildcatter and president and co-owner of Triad Energy Inc. “Everyone thinks it’s Beverly Hillbillies: You shoot a gun and oil comes out. It’s not.”

It was unclear until this year whether producers would be able to replicate Hamm’s results outside of the Bakken. The answer is yes. Texas pumped the most oil since 1988. Output from Wyoming grew 7 percent, the biggest jump in records going back to 1981, Energy Department figures show. New Mexico’s increased by 13 percent, and Oklahoma’s by 18 percent.

Morse, whose bullish predictions of U.S. energy self- sufficiency early this year met with skepticism, said North America will be able to meet its own needs by 2020. The pace of growth and the potential for worldwide gains driven by ever- improving technology toppled the theory that the world supply of oil had had peaked and begun an inexorable decline, he said.

“Peak oil is dead,” Morse said.

Canadian Oil Sands Ltd.

Canadian Oil Sands

Canadian Oil Sands (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Canadian Oil Sands Ltd. 

COS : TSX : C$20.43
HOLD Target: C$22.00

eld on November 30 at 10am ET: 888-231-8191 or 647-427-7450. We don’t expect anything meaningful to come out of the call.
 2013 production guidance of 106-116 MBbl/d net (with a single point target of 110.4 MBbl/d net) is in line with our 109 MBbl/d estimate and the Street’s 111 MBbl/d forecast. As expected, it incorporates a planned turnaround of Coker 8-1 in H2/13.
 2013 capex budget of $1.33 billion is in line with our $1.3 billion estimate and only slightly below the Street’s $1.4 billion forecast. This is also up roughly $200 million YoY. Unit opcost guidance of $36.67/Bbl is in line with our $36.62/Bbl forecast.
 COS plans to maintain its $0.35/share quarterly dividend (we weren’t expecting a cut), equating to a total annual dividend payout of roughly $678 million. However, of note, at our US$90/Bbl WTI price deck we estimate that COS will outspend cash flows (before dividends) by almost $190 million. Nevertheless, at 9/30/12, the company had $963 million of working capital, $1.5 billion of unused credit, and a net debt to total net cap of only 6%, which is why the company has confidence in the sustainability of its dividend.
 2014 is expected to be the last year of the multi-year major project spending. Specifically, COS reiterated that major project spending is
expected to be roughly $800 million in 2014. Therefore, adding an estimated $400 million of maintenance capex on top of this would
yield a total 2014 capex budget of roughly $1.2 billion. As such, post 2014 is when investors can look forward to a potential significant
increase in dividends.
Reflecting some minor adjustments, we are slightly raising our 2013 CFPS estimate to $2.43 from $2.41. We maintain our $22 target,which is based on 0.9x our risked NAV estimate.

Trans-Canada – New Oilsands Pipeline Planned

Looking north on Highway 63 in Fort McMurray, ...

Looking north on Highway 63 in Fort McMurray, Alberta. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

TransCanada  (TRP : TSX : $44.72)

Oct 30

From Fort McMurray to Edmonton to you!

 

Trans – Canada announced a 50/50 JV with privately-held Phoenix Energy Holdings to develop a $3-billion oil pipeline from northwest of Fort McMurray to Edmonton. The line will have 900,000 bpd of crude oil capacity as well as 330,000 bpd of condensate capacity. Phoenix Energy has underpinned the project with a long-term contract to ship crude and diluent on the line.

The project is expected to be in service in 2017 with construction beginning in 2014. Canaccord Genuity Power & Pipeline Analyst Juan Plessis estimated that the pipeline could add up to ~$0.05 per share to earnings once in service, depending on financing.

This is the second Alberta oil pipeline project TransCanada has announced in the past few months ($660 million 90 km Northern Courier Pipeline between the Fort Hills mine site and the Voyageur Upgrader near Fort McMurray).

Commenting on the deal, Russ Girling, TransCanada’s President and CEO, said,  ” .. it is crucial to have infrastructure in place to move oil to market from emerging developments west of the Athabasca River.”

The Coming Oil Supply Boom

English: Protest against fossil fuels April

English: Protest against fossil fuels April (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

August 11

The most important story in the global economy today may well be some good news that isn’t yet making as many headlines – the coming surge in oil production around the world.

Until very recently, our collective assumption was that oil was running out. That was partly a matter of what seemed like geological common sense. It took millions of years for the Earth to crush plankton into fossil fuels; it is logical to think that it would take millions of years to create more. The rise of the emerging markets, with their energy-hungry billions, was a further reason it seemed obvious that we would have less oil and gas in 2020 than we do today.

Thanks in part to technologies such as horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracking, we are entering a new age of abundant oil. As the energy expert Leonardo Maugeri contends in a recent report published by the Belfer Center at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, “contrary to what most people believe, oil supply capacity is growing worldwide at such an unprecedented level that it might outpace consumption.”

Mr. Maugeri, a research fellow at the Belfer Center and a former oil industry executive, bases that assertion on a field-by-field analysis of most of the major oil exploration and development projects in the world. He concludes that “by 2020, the world’s oil production capacity could be more than 110 million barrels per day, an increase of almost 20 per cent.” Four countries will lead the coming oil boom: Iraq, the United States, Canada and Brazil.

Much of the “new” oil is coming on stream thanks to a technology revolution that has put hard-to-extract deposits within reach: Canada’s oil sands, U.S. shale oil, Brazil’s presalt oil.

“The extraction technologies are not new,” Mr. Maugeri explains in the report, “but the combination of technologies used to exploit shale and tight oils has evolved. The technology can also be used to reopen and recover more oil from conventional, established oil fields.”

Mr. Maugeri thinks the tipping point will be 2015. Until then, the oil market will be “highly volatile” and “prone to extreme movements in opposite directions.” But after 2015, Mr. Maugeri predicts a “glut of oil,” which could lead to a fall, or even a “collapse,” in prices.

At a time when the global meme is of America’s inevitable economic decline, the surge in oil supply capacity is an important contrarian indicator. Mr. Maugeri calculates that the United States “could conceivably produce up to 65 per cent of its oil consumption needs domestically.” That national energy boom is already providing a powerful economic stimulus in some parts of the country – just look at North Dakota. Crucially, at a time when one of the biggest social and political problems in the U.S. is the disappearance of well-paid, blue-collar work, particularly for men, oil patch jobs fill that void.

Equally significant is the impact of oil on the most important human problem of our times: the environment. The sources of oil that will fuel the coming boom are harder to reach than the supplies of the 20th century, and the technologies required to extract them are more invasive. That will be one fault line in what is sure to be the escalating battle between environmentalists and the oil industry.

The implications for the climate change debate are even more fraught. Until now, the arithmetic of oil supply and the agenda of environmentalists conveniently dovetailed. Since we were running out of oil anyway, environmentally motivated efforts to limit fossil fuel consumption and increase our use of renewable energy boasted the additional virtue of being inevitable. In an age of abundant oil, those economically utilitarian arguments lose their power.

For environmentalists, and for the liberal political parties with which they are usually aligned, that poses a serious challenge. The temptation will be to oppose new oil production projects indiscriminately. That instinct could be politically dangerous. Political progress in combatting climate change has been slow, but the battle for hearts and minds, especially of the younger generation, is being won. That political capital can be lost in an instant if the environmental movement allows itself to be equated with opposition to one of the lone sources of growth – and of good blue-collar jobs – at a time of global economic stagnation.

A final conclusion to draw from the next oil revolution is a little more existential. This is yet another reminder that what both common sense and expert consensus assure us to be true very often isn’t. It was obvious that efficient markets worked and financial deregulation would stimulate economic growth, until the financial crisis and the subsequent international economic recession. It was equally apparent that we were running out of oil – until we weren’t.

Oil Sands ” Needs ” $ 80 : Canadian Natural Resources

Canadian Natural Resources Limited

Canadian Natural Resources Limited (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. CNQ ( TSX) $ 31.02

 

August 10

CNQ said Thursday , August 9 ,it has cut capital spending this year by $680-million or 10 per cent – much of that from its Horizon oil sands project. The company is attempting to hold the line on spending, while acknowledging that new projects will need oil prices of nearly $80 (U.S.) a barrel – not far from current levels – to turn a minimum acceptable profit.

The move comes amid what’s being called a “big rethink” of the oil sands, where costs have risen so high that new projects are increasingly vulnerable to crude prices at the same time as environmental pressures place question marks over the pipelines intended to take new barrels to market.

The CNRL spending pare-back comes a little more than two weeks after Suncor Energy Inc. abandoned a plan to reach production of a million barrels a day by 2020.

Suncor said it would instead apply “rigorous scrutiny” to three of its most important new oil sands projects, worth more than $20-billion (Canadian).

The new uncertainty casts a shadow over a rosy new industry forecast, released in June by the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, that projected oil sands output to more than double by 2021, adding just over two million barrels a day in a decade.

At the same time, it points to the upheaval facing an industry that has seen many of its fundamental assumptions shaken in recent years. Not only have new pipeline plans been the subject of massive public scrutiny, but a sudden rise in production of light oil spurred by technology have made clear that the oil sands are no longer the only – or best – bet for companies seeking to pump new barrels.

In Alberta alone, new fracking techniques have in the past two years brought 175,000 barrels a day of unexpected light oil production – the equivalent of two large oil sands facilities, notes Peter Tertzakian, chief energy economist with ARC Financial Corp.

A half century of certainty over the source and destination of hydrocarbons is suddenly in question, and the “oil sands was more of a compelling story even a year ago than it is today. Now if you’ve got a billion dollars to spend, you’ve go to be thinking about all these threats and new opportunities and how you’re going to spend your money,” Mr. Tertzakian said. It is “a big rethink of capital allocation.”

Part of it is related to the sheer difficulty of turning a profit in the oil sands. CNRL, for example has set $100,000 per flowing barrel, a standard metric showing the cost of producing one daily barrel of crude, as the de facto ceiling for the cost of its Horizon expansion.

“Above $100,000 a flowing barrel, you start to erode your economics on these projects,” said company president Steve Laut. But even at that level, the company says it needs $80 (U.S.) WTI – the U.S. benchmark oil price, which closed Thursday at $93.50 – “to get a return on capital that we require.”

To hold the line on those costs, CNRL has cut $405-million (Canadian), or 17.5 per cent, from its 2012 spending on Horizon. Roughly 30 per cent of the decrease came from cost savings achieved by, for example, splitting up and re-tendering contracts where bids came in too high. But the remainder came by way of “strategic deferrals” in which the company delayed spending in hopes that it can gain better pricing in the future.

It is a “good thing to get better costs and let the schedule slip,” Mr. Laut said. CNRL has not yet seen completion dates change for the extra 135,000 barrels a day of production it is building at Horizon. But the company is only partway through the project, and is “close to pushing out” its completion dates, Mr. Laut said.

What’s clear, CIBC World Markets Inc. said in a Thursday report, is that the spending uncertainty in the oil sands is cause for concern. Although the cuts won’t affect growth in the next few quarters, they “will push back long-term targets and raise questions regarding project viability,” CIBC said.

Black Pearl Resources – A Real Pearl – Double Target $6.00

Black Pearl

Black Pearl (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

BlackPearl Resources Inc. 
PXX : TSX : C$3.29  Buy , Target C$6.00

August 9
• Q2/12 results; wet weather dampens full year guidance; maintaining BUY rating and C$6.00 target
Investment recommendation
BlackPearl released second quarter results that were slightly below our forecast but generally in line with consensus. The company revised down its guidance to reflect wet weather and the resulting impact on its drilling plans at Mooney in 2H/12. We continue to recommend the stock given its strong management team and high quality asset base with proven commercial production rates at its Blackrod SAGD pilot project. Our BUY recommendation and 12-month C$6.00 target price remain unchanged; our target is based on a 1.0x multiple to NAV.
Investment highlights
Q2 results in line with consensus. Production during the quarter averaged 9,471 boe/d, less than our 10,000 boe/d expectation. CFPS was commensurately lower at $0.07 versus our $0.08/share estimate. We had a slightly higher capital spending forecast during the quarter which caused most of the variance to our estimates.
Guidance down slightly. Its capital and production guidance was revised downward (exit production down 1,000 boe/d) to reflect a reduced drilling program at Mooney (Phase 2 area) in 2H/12. This is strictly a timing issue; therefore, we have made no change to our NAV valuation of $5.80/share.
Still some financing overhang in the stock. Management remains confident that it has a number of financing options for its large scale, longer term thermal development projects at Blackrod and Onion Lake. We continue to believe it will  look at a mix of options, including asset sales, debt, equity, and potential partnerships or joint ventures.

Valuation

BlackPearl trades at 0.6x CNAV, 11.0x EV/DACF, and $101,900/BOEPD on our 2013 estimates versus our heavy oil/oil sands peer group averages of 0.7x CNAV, 10.8x EV/DACF, and $110,500/BOEPD.

Cenovus Energy Inc. Target $44 for Bakken and Oil Sands Values

English: This map shows the extent of the oil ...

English: This map shows the extent of the oil sands in Alberta, Canada. The three oil sand deposits are known as the Athabasca Oil Sands, the Cold Lake Oil Sands, and the Peace River Oil Sands. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Cenovus Energy Inc. 
CVE : TSX : C$31.15  Buy , Target C$44.00

July 26
CVE’s Q2 operating results confirmed our view that the risk/reward on betting on
a large beat, particularly on the downstream side, vs. guidance

The company concluded its Telephone Lake strategic process without a transaction rather than just reiterating that things are going slow. These two events are what caused the selloff in the stock, in our view; and as a result we see a good buying opportunity due to the following:
1) Oil sands development continues to gain momentum; but ignored by the market. Both Christina Lake and Foster Creek have demonstrated the ability to produce beyond stated capacity. Construction on Christina Lake Phase D is moving faster than scheduled, with first production now expected in Q3/12 vs. the previously guided Q4/12 date.

Additionally, future optimizations at Christina Lake and Foster creek continue to help further push the limits of these projects. We
estimate that these optimizations/accelerations add ~2 % to CVE’s NAV (on a 10% NPV basis). However, this was ignored by the market.
2) There appears to be another one-time item in the EPS number, which when excluded puts Q2 results in line with the Street’s: Q1/12 EPS (clean) at first glance appeared to be roughly $0.43/share (before a tax-adjusted one-time exploration expense of $68M), missing the Bloomberg consensus average of $0.53/share (as of 7/24/12). There was also a one time adjustment to U.S. tax estimates, which impacted earnings by roughly another $0.07/share. Excluding this, Q1/12 EPS of $0.50 was essentially in line with the Street.

 Our target price is based on 6x our 2013 ex oil sands and downstream DACF estimate, 5.5x 2013E downstream cash flows, plus almost $28/share of combined estimated risked net present oil sands and Bakken/Lower Shaunavon value.

Oil : Integrateds / Refiners : AMP Forecast – Margins Up With U.S. Production

English: Oil products tanker Maersk Riesa (IMO...

English: Oil products tanker Maersk Riesa (IMO 9252292) near port of Odessa, Ukraine. Русский: Танкер Maersk Riesa (IMO 9252292) возле порта Одессы. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

July 25

Oil integrateds/refiners are set to report later this week. U.S is now a net exporter of oil products.

Equity Analysts have paired back expectations not only for the balance of 2012 but for 2013 as well.

While bearish expectations seem to be the theme of late, these projections could prove too bearish. Indeed, over the next few years refining margins should stay elevated due to robust oil output in the Midwest, transportation bottlenecks and growing foreign demand for U.S. oil products

Over the past three years, U.S. oil output from the Midwest has doubled to about 1M bbl/day which has created an unprecedented glut in crude inventories and contained WTI prices. At the same time, rising global oil demand from developing economies has allowed Brent prices to stay resilient in the $105-125 range.

With refiners selling energy products in Brent markets, Midwest refiners have enjoyed very fat margins. As long as oil from the Midwest cannot flow fast enough to Gulf Coast refineries, which account for more than half the total U.S. refining capacity, the Brent/WTI spread should stay wide. Eventually, signs that bottlenecks abate should be reflected in lower oil carload volumes and rails’ pricing power.

Now, a less well understood cause for elevated crack spreads are very tight oil product inventories owing to rising demand from foreign markets. From its peak in early 2008, U.S. consumption of energy products has dropped 2.2M bbl/day to 18.7M. However, over the same period, the U.S. has gone from a net importer (2.3M bbl/day) to a net exporter (0.7M bbl/day) of oil products. As a result, total U.S. oil products consumed domestically and in foreign markets have reached new highs at 19.4M bbl/day.

This explains why refinery capacity rates continue to increase. Importantly, petroleum products are final motor gasoline (46%), distillate fuel oil (20%), kerosene jet fuel (8%) and other “non power” fuels (26%).Data shows that the U.S. is now a net exporter in all of these four categories with gasoline being the predominant product being exported to South American countries notably. So to sum it up, gasoline, distillate and kerosene inventories (74% of all products) oscillate near historical lows while demand keeps rising.

Unless foreign demand for U.S. oil products comes to a sudden halt, and inventories start to build, refining margins should stay elevated. Bottom line: Accumulate oil integrated/refiners’ shares during dips and stay overweight the group as refining margins are likely to stay high over the next year or two.  AMP Top Picks : Suncor and Chevron

U.S. Losing the Canadian Oil Sands To China

China National Offshore Oil Corporation

China National Offshore Oil Corporation (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

July 25

Some U.S. politicians come down hard on the Obama Administration for what will no doubt be described as driving Canada’s energy sector into the arms of China:

Cnooc Ltd. (883)’s $15.1 billion cash takeover bid for Nexen Inc. (NXY) signals a Canadian shift toward China and away from the U.S. as the nation’s traditional oil and natural-gas partner and main export market.

Canada’s oil sands reserves, the third-largest recoverable crude deposits in the world, were developed in part by U.S. money as companies such as California’s Richfield Oil Corp. brought technology to extract bitumen from boreal peat bogs half a century ago. Now, for the first time, a Chinese company will own and operate oil-sands crude production as well as Nexen’s shale-gas assets in British Columbia, along with leases in other parts of the world.

Chinese oil producers have turned more frequently to Canada after political opposition in the U.S. derailed Cnooc’s $18.5 billion bid for Unocal Corp. in 2005, and after TransCanada Corp. (TRP)’s Keystone XL pipeline route south to Texas was blocked by President Barack Obama’s administration last year. (Bloomberg)

The Nexen deal is important for two reasons. First, it potentially represents some absolution for CNOOC, which is best known in foreign investment circles as the company which botched the 2005 U.S. UNOCAL takeover, not taking into account American politics and the need for a public relations strategy. As the Nexen deal will require regulatory approval in several jurisdictions, we will see what lessons CNOOC has learned from the failed UNOCAL bid.

Second, as Bloomberg points out, the deal represents a further shift by Canada away from the U.S. towards China. Another deal involving Sinopec and Talisman Energy was announced yesterday as well, and there have been other recent transactions, including CNOOC’s takeover of Nexen partner Opti Canada.

Why is this happening? The simple answer is that Canada is one of the world’s largest energy suppliers, and rapidly-growing China is willing to pay a premium in the sector to diversify its holdings into a country that is politically stable. China realized years ago the political risks it was facing in the Middle East and set out to remedy the situation. It has succeeded.

How important is this strategy to China? CNOOC’s bid for Nexen’s shares apparently represented a 61% premium. Nexen had to be pleased with that. And China isn’t just getting oil for its money. If the deal goes through, CNOOC would also get some very attractive technical expertise, including know-how related to shale-gas extraction.

Canada’s traditional partner in this area has been the U.S., whose interest in Canadian development has been on the wane. Factor in the decision to reject the Keystone Pipeline project because of American environmental concerns, and China is starting to look better and better to the Canadians.

If this investment trend continues, assuming that Ottawa approves the Nexen deal, perhaps in a few years we will all be talking about the new U.S. “Canada Pivot” policy. In the meantime, you can be sure that critics of the controversial Keystone Pipeline decision, particularly Republicans with ties to the oil and gas industry, will use this deal to beat up on President Obama.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,176 other followers