ARM Holdings plc

The official logo for the ARM processor archit...

The official logo for the ARM processor architecture (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

ARMH : NASDAQ : US$47.24
ARM : LSE
BUY 
Target: US$56.00

COMPANY DESCRIPTION:
ARM is a leading semiconductor IP supplier to the diverse global semiconductor market. ARM’s revenues are driven through a licensing and royalty business model, with a majority of the royalty sales driven by the mobile market
including handsets, smartphones, and tablets. ARM also supplies semiconductor IP to the server, PC, and embedded markets and physical implementation libraries and IP to semiconductor foundries.
All amounts in US$ unless otherwise noted.

Investment recommendation:
From ARM’s analyst day yesterday in London where ARM management highlighted strong longterm market and royalty growth opportunities in both high- and low-tier smartphones.

We believe ARM is well positioned to benefit from quickly increasing emerging market feature phone to smartphone upgrades, ramping low-tier tablets, and high-tier smartphone platform refreshes that should drive royalty TAM growth and rate expansion. Further, with a growing number of ARM partners moving toward multi-core Cortex-A, big.LITTLE, and ARMv8 designs at leading edge process nodes, we anticipate strong license sales in the near to medium term will drive strong royalty revenue growth and both operating and earnings leverage long term. We reiterate our BUY rating and raise our price target to $56.
Investment highlights
 Our Q1/13 monthly handset sales surveys and recent March quarter results and June quarter guidance for ARM mobile chipset partners are consistent with ARM’s estimates for very strong growth of the low- and mid-tier smartphone markets and also resilient growth of the high-tier market driven flagship launches and 4G/LTE upgrades.
 At its analyst day, ARM shared its target of 15-25% smartphone royalty sales CAGR through 2017 and anticipates smartphone unit CAGR of 20% for the industry during the same period. In fact, this estimate includes growth in both the high- and lower-tier smartphone markets, and we believe ARM will generate significant royalty revenue growth from both tiers driven by a royalty rate expansion multiplier in the slower-growing high-tier market and upgrades
from lower royalty feature phones in lower tiers.
 Due to increased royalty estimates from lower tier smartphones and tablets, we are increasing our 2013 earnings/ADS estimate from $1.01 to $1.02 and our 2014 estimate from $1.31 to $1.35.

Valuation:

Our $56 price target (from $52) is based on shares trading at
roughly 42x our 2014 normalized earnings/ADS estimate.

Apple Target $ 600 Q2/F13 PREVIEW; UPDATING ESTIMATES

Image representing Apple as depicted in CrunchBase

Image via CrunchBase

AAPL : NASDAQ : US$423.20
BUY 
Target: US$600.00

Q2/F13 PREVIEW; UPDATING ESTIMATES

 

Investment recommendation:

Our monthly and overall March quarter global handset surveys indicated iPhone 5 sales declined consistent with normal seasonal patterns after very strong December holiday quarter sales. However, our surveys indicated stronger sales of iPhone 4/4S models at reduced prices, and we have updated our iPhone estimates.
Given our expectations for a summer iPhone refresh combined with competitor smartphone ramps including the Samsung Galaxy S4 during the transitional June quarter, we believe Apple could lose meaningful near-term market and profit share before the iPhone 5S refresh. Longer term, we maintain our belief Apple has a strong product pipeline that should result in reaccelerating Y/Y earnings growth during 2H/C2013.

In the near term, we believe Apple is likely to increase cash returns to shareholders. We reiterate our BUY rating and $600 price target.
Investment highlights
 Our March quarter global handset surveys indicated the iPhone 5, 4S, and 4 maintained leading share of the high-end smartphone market with improving supply and a stronger mix of iPhone 4 and 4S sales than our expectations.

 Based on reduced iPhone pricing combined with our increased iPhone 4 and 4S sales assumptions, we are increasing our March/June quarter iPhone unit estimates from 34.5M/25M to 37M/27M. However, with an increased mix of iPhone 4/4S sales, we are decreasing our ASP estimate from $651 in the December quarter to $601 in the March quarter.
 These adjustments slightly raise our F2013 EPS estimate from $43.59 to $43.86 and our F2014 estimate from $50.00 to $50.16.
Valuation:

Our $600 price target is based on shares trading at roughly 12x our F2014 EPS estimate.

Close window
Stock Market Magic: Building Your Apprentice Millionaire Portfolio 2012: All you need to succeed in today’s stock market

 

RF Micro Devices Target $ 7

English: A ridiculous line of people waiting f...

English: A ridiculous line of people waiting for the iPhone 3G outside of the Apple Store on 5th Ave. between 58th St. and 59th St., NYC, July 12, 2008. I was not in the line. pictured: the Apple Store entrance (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

RFMD : NASDAQ : US$5.32
BUY 
Target: US$7.00

COMPANY DESCRIPTION:
RF Micro Devices is a leading supplier of power amplifiers, front end modules and other RF components for mobile devices (handsets, smartphones, tablets) and communications infrastructure.

Investment recommendation:

We believe RFMD is well positioned to deliver strong growth in C2013/14 driven by share gains in flagship LTE smartphone platforms including Samsung, Nokia, BlackBerry, and Apple. Further, given RFMD’s strong position in mid- and low-tier believe RFMD is well positioned to benefit from elastic smartphone demand in emerging markets including China.

Overall, we believe RFMD should grow faster than the RFIC market in F14/15 and improved capacity utilization should drive margin leverage. We upgrade RFMD shares from HOLD to BUY and raise our price target to $7 from $5.50.
Investment highlights
 Given RFMD’s improved LTE portfolio including Phenom PAs and antenna switching solutions, we believe RFMD is well positioned to gain content share in flagship smartphone platforms including the Samsung Galaxy S4, Nokia Lumia and Asha series, BlackBerry Z10 and Q10, and potentially Apple’s iPhone 5S. In addition, we believe RFMD is less exposed to softer near-term iPhone sales that should have a greater impact to RFMD’s competitors.
 Further, our market analysis indicates ramping sales of affordable 3G smartphones from Chinese OEMs powered by Qualcomm QRD, MediaTek, and Spreadtrum turnkey solutions, and we believe RFMD has strong share, particularly in TD-SCDMA smartphones.
 Finally, while we concede Qualcomm’s entry into the CMOS PA market could potentially shrink the long-term TAM for PA suppliers, including RFMD, we believe the intermediate impact to RFMD’s market share, design wins, sales, and earnings are negligible.
 We maintain our above-consensus F2014 pro forma EPS estimate of $0.42 and introduce our F2015 estimate of $0.63.
Valuation:

Our $7 price target is based on shares trading at roughly 11x our F2015 pro forma EPS estimate.

Apple To Build Macs In America Again : CEO Tim Cook

Image representing Apple as depicted in CrunchBase

Image via CrunchBase

Bloomberg News

Apple Inc. plans to spend more than $100-million next year on building Mac computers in the U.S., shifting a small portion of manufacturing away from China, the country that has handled assembly of its products for years.

“Next year we’re going to bring some production to the U.S.,” Cook said in an interview with Bloomberg Businessweek. “This doesn’t mean that Apple will do it ourselves, but we’ll be working with people and we’ll be investing our money.”

Apple, which until the late 1990s made and assembled many products in the U.S., moved manufacturing to Asia to take advantage of the region’s lower labour costs. The planned investment makes up a sliver of Apple’s $121.3-billion in cash, and probably won’t meaningfully affect profit margins. Still, it reflects pressure on companies to create even a modest number of domestic jobs as the unemployment rate hovers near 8% and the economy rebounds from the recession that ended in 2009.

“I don’t think we have a responsibility to create a certain kind of job,” Cook said. “But I think we do have a responsibility to create jobs.”

Cook discussed the investment plans in an interview that touched on his relationship with Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, the recent dismissal of senior executives and the company’s competition with Samsung Electronics Co.

While Cook didn’t outline where the manufacturing would happen or how much would be produced in the U.S., he said the company will work with partners and that the operations would include more than just final assembly.

Shares Decline

Apple’s shares declined the most in almost four years Wednesday on concern that the company will lose ground in smartphones to Nokia Oyj in China while giving up market share to Google Inc. in tablets.

China Mobile Ltd., China’s largest wireless carrier, agreed to carry the Lumia 920T, a device based on Microsoft Corp.’s Windows Phone 8 software.

In another announcement that may have fuelled the stock’s slide, research firm IDC said Wednesday that Apple’s share of the tablet market will slip to 53.8% this year from 56.3% in 2011, while Google’s will increase.

Creating Jobs

Many of the parts that go into the iPhone and iPad already are made in the U.S. This includes the display glass, which is made in Kentucky, Cook said.

Apple also has created jobs in the mobile-software industry through the introduction of the iPhone in 2007, which fuelled an explosion in creation of applications, he said.

Besides building a new headquarters in Cupertino, California, Apple is working on a campus in Austin, Texas, Cook said. The company is building new data centers in Nevada and Oregon, while expanding an existing one in Maiden, North Carolina, he said.

Before shifting work abroad, Apple had handled manufacturing in such locations as as Elk Grove, California, near Sacramento, and Fountain, Colorado, near Colorado Springs.

Mac desktop and laptop computers — once Apple’s cornerstone — have been dwarfed by the iPhone and iPad more recently. With sales of $23.2 billion on 18.2 million units last year, Macs accounted for just 15% of total revenue. The device is currently manufactured mostly in China.

Other companies that have said they’ll shift production back to the U.S. from overseas include Caterpillar Inc. and General Electric Co. Google Inc. this year delayed a wireless media device that it had pledged to build in California.

Cook, in the interview, also addressed his recent decision to revamp Apple’s management team to improve cooperation among groups. Senior Vice President Scott Forstall, a main architect of the iPhone software that’s now on more than 400 million Apple devices, was fired in October amid complaints that he clashed with other senior executives.

Samsung Ties

“These moves take collaboration to a whole different level,” Cook said, without discussing specific executives. “We already were — to use an industry phrase that I don’t like — best of breed. But it takes us to a whole new level. So that’s what it’s all about.”

Cook also said Apple has a complicated relationship with Samsung, one of Apple’s biggest component suppliers and its chief rival in the smartphone and tablet markets.

Apple iPhone 5 Supply Report AMP Target $800

English: The logo for Apple Computer, now Appl...

English: The logo for Apple Computer, now Apple Inc.. The design of the logo started in 1977 designed by Rob Janoff with the rainbow color theme used until 1999 when Apple stopped using the rainbow color theme and used a few different color themes for the same design. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Dec. 3

Apple 
AAPL : NASDAQ : US$585.28
BUY  Target: US$800.00

AMP as per our book The Apprentice Millionaire Program remains a fan of Apple and readers continue to profit by holding the stock.

 

CHECKS INDICATE STRONG IPHONE 5 SALES WITH IMPROVED SUPPLY
Investment recommendation:

Our November channel checks indicated very strong sales of the iPhone 5 at AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint and also in international markets with dramatically improved supply.

Given these checks combined with Apple’s strong plans for an iPhone 5 ramp to 240 carriers in 100 countries by year end, including China on  December 14, we have slightly increased our above-consensus December quarter iPhone estimates. Bolstered by the iPhone 5, we believe Apple’s
industry-leading software ecosystem and integrated hardware experience will lead to a strong multi-year product cycle.

We reiterate our BUY rating and $800 price target.
Investment highlights
 Our November checks indicated very strong sales of the top-selling iPhone 5 at AT&T/Verizon/Sprint. Our checks also indicated substantially improved iPhone supply with essentially all stores offering all SKUs of the iPhone 5. Further, our checks indicated strong sales of legacy iPhone 4/4S models with the iPhone 4 sold out at many stores and strong Black Friday iPad and iPad mini sales.
 Given our checks and improving supply levels, we are increasing our December iPhone sales estimate from 45.0M to 47.5M units and slightly lowering our March quarter estimate from 47.5M to 46.0M units as the earlier China launch should pull sales into December.
Apple and Samsung increase lead despite increased competition” .
 Given our estimative for a 77% sequential unit increase in iPhone sales, which represent Apple’s highest-margin hardware product line, we believe Apple’s December quarter gross margin guidance of 36% could prove conservative, and we are modeling 38.7%. We have increased our Q1/F2013 pro forma EPS estimate from $13.46 to $14.04 and our F2013 estimate from $53.13 to $53.15.
Valuation:

Our $800 price target is based on shares trading at roughly 13x our F2014 estimate.

 

Barclays Bank Shifts To Apple iPads

English: The iPad on a table in the Apple case

English: The iPad on a table in the Apple case (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Nov. 26

Apple (AAPL : NASDAQ : US$571.50)
Barclays Bank (BCS : NYSE : US$16.28)
Barclays Bank is set to outfit its staff with more than 8,500 iPads in an effort to improve client
service.

The company said that it was employees demanded the iPad, allowing them “to assist our branch colleagues to interact with customers, improving the customer experience.”

The spokesperson said, “We investigated a number of different tablet options and in this instance, we concluded that iPads were the best solution for their specific needs. We are now starting to use these across Barclays branches in the U.K.” The company did not confirm what type of iPad it was buying, but even if it is the iPad mini, the firm will be shelling out over 2 million pounds to buy the tablets, assuming it pays retail prices.

Motley Fool iPad Review : MF Disses The Apple iPad Mini

English: Apple iPad Event

English: Apple iPad Event (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Oct .31

from the Motley Fool Review

The iPad mini reviews are arriving, and they’re not very flattering when it comes to the graphics of Apple‘s (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) new device.

  • “It’s disappointing to go non-retina after using the retina iPad for the last seven months,” Daring Fireball’s John Gruber writes. “All of the accolades and advantages of retina displays work in reverse.”
  • “I don’t think the lower resolution is a deal-breaker in this product, but it is a compromise you have to be aware of,” writes The Verge. “It simply doesn’t look as clear as other products on the market.”
  • “But oh, that screen,” concludes CNET. “It’s not bad, not at all, but it’s not Retina Display. It’s not even as high-res as other 7-inch tablets.”

You know what makes things worse? The other tablets that The Verge and CNET are referring to — Google‘s (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) Nexus 7 and Amazon.com‘s (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) Kindle Fire HD — sell for nearly 40% less.

Is Apple going to sell a ton of these things? Absolutely. Folks trying to buy them online now are being told to either try their luck at a local store or wait two to three weeks for shipping. Unlike the other new tablet maker using a similar tactic — Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) with its Surface now at a three-week delay for all of its models — Apple probably is the one that can’t really keep up with the initial demand.

iQuandary
Apple knew that it couldn’t pack all of the features of the fourth — or even the third — generation of its iPad into the $329 iPad mini. Too many consumers would simply trade down to the cheaper iOS tablet. the launch would be a cannibalization disaster.

Somewhere along the way, it was decided that the iPad mini would go with two features — the slower A5 chip and the 1024-by-768 resolution — of the $399 iPad 2. If the iPad mini would eat into sales, it would be preferable if it was the iPad 2 that’s $70 more than the new iPad that’s $170 more.

The chip isn’t much of a problem. Most consumers can’t tell the difference between the dual-core A5 and the dual-core A6X that raises the stakes with quad-core graphics. The same can’t be said for the display. Seeing truly is believing, and anyone walking into an Apple Store to see the two devices side by side will see the problem.

Apple has spent the last two iPad incarnations pitching consumers on the merits of Retina Display where individual pixels can’t be discerned. Now it doesn’t want the same consumers that it educated to notice the difference? It’s like taking someone on a fine wine tasting, only to wash it down with cooking wine. It’s like explaining the finer points of music on the way to a Justin Bieber concert.

They’re mocking you, Cupertino
The competition is starting to sense Apple as vulnerable.

You saw it last month when Samsung mocked the iPhone 5 early adopters. Ads made fun of those standing in line for Apple’s shiny new smartphone, just as Apple would ridicule PC users a few years earlier.

Over the weekend, it was Amazon going on the offensive on its magnetic website’s home page, pitting the iPad mini’s inferior specs against its much cheaper Kindle Fire HD.

Is Apple going to admit that it made a mistake, here? If Scott Forstall was let go as a result of Apple Maps, who will take the fall for Apple craps?

It’s not just me seeing this, right? The iPad mini’s refusal to go high-def is a call that undermines everything Apple has done to get to where it is today.

Junk in the trunk
Steve Jobs mocked the 7-inch gadgetry as tweeners. He also mocked the manufacturers that would sacrifice features for the sake of nailing a low price point.

“We just can’t ship junk,” he famously said five years ago. “There are thresholds that we can’t cross because of who we are.”

Well?

Apple won’t win with this strategy in the long run. It’s in the company’s best interest for it to fail here.

Why? Well, if consumers do accept the iPad mini with a display that is inferior to even the $199 tablets on the market, it will only encourage Apple to settle in the future. If shoppers are such lemmings that they’ll buy anything with a bitten Apple logo on it, the quality of the company’s products will decline in a hurry. In time, they’ll smarten up and stop trusting Apple.

The iPad mini needs to fail for Apple to succeed.

Wrap your head around that until it sinks in. You’ll probably agree.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Aristotle Munarriz has no positions in the stocks mentioned above. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Amazon.com, Google, and Microsoft. Motley Fool newsletter services recommend Apple, Amazon.com, Google, and Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

a disclosure policy.

Google’s Chromebook : Review

 

Image representing Google Chrome as depicted i...

Image via CrunchBase

Tech blog FT

High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights. http://blogs.ft.com/tech-blog/2012/10/googles-chromebook-comes-of-age/#ixzz2Ag6Q5653The launch this week of a $249 (£229) Chromebook makes Google’s vision of computing in the cloud affordable and appealing, with a thin and light machine from Samsung that is $200 cheaper than its previous model released in May.

This is the fourth version of the Chromebook I have tried and Google and Samsung appear to have finally got it right. The CR-48 prototype was too buggy and had a terrible, unusable trackpad; the first proper Chromebook in June 2011 seemed too restrictive – I felt trapped inside a browser that filled the screen; the second, released a year later, seemed a mismatch of free limited software and expensive high-spec hardware – I thought then that Google’s vision of the future appeared to be about paying more for less.

With the new Chromebook, the balance and the price are right.

This is less powerful and makes more compromises on components than its predecessor, but not so that you would notice or mind much, as everything works so well.

The screen has been reduced in size from 12.1in to 11.6in, but it is still sharp and pleasing. The construction is less classy – it is aluminium-coloured plastic. But this is a smaller, lighter machine – just 2.4lbs down from 3.3lbs, and it has more memory – 16Gb versus just 4Gb before.

The trackpad works smoothly and superbly and the keys are nicely spaced to make typing a pleasant experience – I am writing this review on it now (One bugbear remains – still no delete key, only a backspace one).

Battery life is about six hours, aided by one of Samsung’s own Arm-based processors, rather than an Intel one this time, which also makes the Chromebook run cool and silent on my lap.

Riding the Caltrain from San Francisco to Mountain View, I felt a little inferior banging away on this next to someone with a MacBook Air – before realising he would have paid four times as much.

The Chromebook turns on in a flash and web pages load quickly – it has dual-band 802.11n Wi-Fi as well as Bluetooth 3.0. There is also a USB 3.0 port, a 2.0 one, a full HDMI connection and a memory card slot. A webcam and microphones are above the screen.

The software is much the same. Google is thankfully sticking with allowing us a desktop to run the Chrome browser inside and there is the useful taskbar giving access to an increasing number of apps. I did not try them all, but the Chrome Remote Desktop Beta worked better than previously in putting the desktops of my Windows and Mac computers in a browser window and letting me control them. They looked slightly fuzzy and I could not make them go full-screen, but this can be a useful feature.

For someone who spends most of his time in one Google service or another – Gmail, Drive, Chrome browsing, Play for music and other entertainment – I would certainly slip the Chromebook into a bag on days when I am out and about and not needing to do any heavy-lifting PC work.

Where Google services are weaker – for example, Chat is still poorly designed and no match for Skype – the Chrome operating system still seems limited in not being compatible with or having available some favourite programs.

But overall the Chromebook feels like a mature product and no longer a questionable experiment on whether we are ready to live in the cloud.

Microsoft Surface – Getting Some Awful Reviews

Image representing Microsoft as depicted in Cr...

Image via CrunchBase

Oct 24

The reviews are in for Microsoft’s Surface tablet. And the verdict is not good.  

The most scathing of the reviews we’ve read so far comes from Josh Topolsky at The Verge

Here’s a sampling of what he has to say:

  • “It’s also not very useful on your lap — unless you like to struggle.”
  • “It’s not really that comfortable to hold in landscape for extended periods, and in portrait it’s laughably tall.”
  • “I actively avoided using the mail app if at all possible.”
  • “Nearly every app I tried crashed completely at least once while I was testing the tablet, third and first-party.”
  • “This product is supposed to represent the future of Windows and Microsoft, so why did I feel so frustrated so often while using it?”
  • “The whole thing is honestly perplexing. If this device is not as good as (or better than) the best tablet, and not a complete alternative to a laptop — who is this for? What is it supposed to be?”

Gulp. Well, it wasn’t all bad from Topolsky:

“The actual interface — the tiled environment — is a joy to use. It’s really, really cool. I found myself legitimately delighted by some of its functionality, particularly its multitasking and side-by-side apps concept.”

He’s not alone in his criticism of the Surface. Here’s Sam Biddle at Gizmodo:

  • “Surface is a fantastic promise, and holds fantastic potential. But while potential is worth your attention, it’s not worth your paycheck … it is undercooked.”
  • “After the initial delight of an evolved tablet wears off, you’ll groan—because Surface brings the appearance of unity, but it’s really just the worst of both worlds.”
  • “The Touch Cover is a letdown.”

Matt Buchanan of FWD:

“The thing is, Surface is supposed to be so much more than just Microsoft’s iPad alternative, the Other Tablet. It may very well be one day. It has everything it needs to be that. But today it’s just another tablet. And not one you should buy.”

And David Pogue at The New York Times said:

  • “Would you take a job that pays $1 million a year — cutting football fields with toenail clippers? That’s the sort of choice Microsoft is asking you to make with the spectacularly designed, wildly controversial Surface tablet.”
  • “Little inconsistencies and bafflements are everywhere.”

But Pogue did say this:

“On the hardware front, Microsoft has succeeded brilliantly.”

Look, not all of the reviews are wildly negative on the Surface. But, after reading a few of them, and scanning many of the others, the primary takeaway is that this is not better than the iPad.

This is a first generation product from a company that’s never built a computer before. It has some bugs to be worked out. If you were thinking about spending $600 on it, then you might want to think again.

Apple forecasts Schools Giving iPad The Tablet Lead

English: iPad 2 wordmark, by Apple Inc.

English: iPad 2 wordmark, by Apple Inc. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Oct 22

Beyond the school market of course, Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook will use the device to try to widen Apple’s lead over Amazon.com Inc. and Google Inc. and fend off a more recent threat from Microsoft Corp. in the market for tablets, which NPD DisplaySearch predicts will more than double to $162 billion by 2017. Cook will unveil an iPad with a 7.85-inch screen diagonally, people familiar with its development said in August. The current iPad has a 9.7-inch screen.

iPad Shift

Yet Apple executives plan to make a point of highlighting the iPad’s educational capabilities at tomorrow’s event, according to a person with knowledge of the planning. Little wonder. Education spending on information technology, including hardware, was about $19.7 billion in the 2010-2011 period, according to the Center for Digital Education.

Educators’ bet on tablets mirrors a trend in the broader consumer-electronics market, where consumers are buying iPads instead of traditional personal computers. PC sales in K-12 fell 8 percent in the U.S. last quarter, the third straight decline, Gartner said.

“We’re moving away from desktops and laptops,” said James Ponce, the superintendent of theMcAllen Independent School District in Texas. “Ninety percent of the work is now being done on mobile devices.”

School Sales

The education push is part of a strategy put in place under co-Founder Steve Jobs, before the iPad was introduced in 2010. While Apple has a history of selling Mac computers to schools, the company realigned its education sales force to emphasize iPads, a person familiar with the changes said.

Innovation Middle School has traditionally used Lenovo Group Ltd. (992) computers because Macs are too expensive, said Harlan Klein, the school’s principal.

They were cost prohibitive,” Klein said. “With the iPad, they are competitive.”

The new iPad comes at a critical time for Apple. Its shares have dropped 13 percent since reaching a record on Sept. 19, two days before the company released the iPhone 5. The stock rose 1.7 percent to $620.24 at 9:49 a.m. in New York.

Sales of the smartphone have been constrained by supply constraints. Apple is also facing fresh competition in tablets from Microsoft (MSFT), which on Oct. 26 will release the Surface, its first foray into hardware. Apple had about 70 percent of the market in the second quarter, compared with Samsung Electronics Co., which had 9.2 percent, and Amazon’s 4.2 percent, according to IHS ISuppli.

Courting Educators

To woo educators, Apple’s sales staff meets regularly with school administrators and procurement officers across the U.S. The company has sales staff assigned to work with schools in particular regions of the U.S., and pays for district officials to visit Apple’s headquarters in Cupertino, California, to learn about new products.

“Apple has got the world’s biggest education sales force, they have a great device and they have a long history in education,” said Tyler Bosmeny, the CEO of Clever Inc., an education software company. “This is absolutely something that they would be crazy to ignore.”

The company will need to set the new iPad’s price right to woo cash-strapped districts.

“Once these tablets get in to the $200 to $300 range we are going to see a real aggressive uptake in the K-12 market,” said Vineet Madan, a senior vice president at McGraw-Hill Cos. (MHP) education unit.

Training Teachers

Drawing on funds raised through a voter-approved bond measure, the district spent about $370 on each iPad, which comes pre-loaded with various educational applications, Browne said.

Besides budgetary constraints, a major challenge for schools is training teachers and managing all the new equipment and software. If a teacher wants to use an iPad math application, synchronizing a classroom of devices and monitoring all the students’ work can be time consuming. In San Diego, a team of eight employees helps train teachers and manage new technology.

“A lot of the time we see people putting technology in the classroom to be innovative, but it ends up being more work for teachers, not less,” said Bosmeny, whose San Francisco-based company is designed to help schools manage the data from iPad applications. “Everyone becomes a part-time data shuffler.”

Touch Screens

In southern Texas, Ponce of the McAllen Independent School District reached out to Apple soon after the district decided to get away from buying laptops and desktops, which he said were expensive to maintain and unappealing for many students. Apple was at the table helping craft the district’s strategy for integrating technology in classrooms, he said.

“We included them because they have revolutionized the world,” Ponce said. “We had people in the room who were thinking bigger than we could.”

The work resulted in McAllen buying about 25,000 iPads, paying Apple about $3.5 million a year as part of a financing deal the district worked out with Apple. About half the district’s technology budget is now going to Apple, Ponce said. Students are using iPad applications to test for vocabulary, make presentations and compile class notes.

While some teachers have resisted the new technology, many are adapting because they see students are increasingly fluent with touch-screen-based technology, said Courtney Browne, a technology resource teacher at San Diego Unified School District.

“Education is changing and it can’t just be the teacher up there talking,” she said. “It’s not just about the stuff; it takes the teacher to be able to use them.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,189 other followers