Apple Is Suddenly Spending Billions Of Dollars On Secret Projects

English: The logo for Apple Computer, now Appl...

English: The logo for Apple Computer, now Apple Inc.. The design of the logo started in 1977 designed by Rob Janoff with the rainbow color theme used until 1999 when Apple stopped using the rainbow color theme and used a few different color themes for the same design. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

In the quarter ending June 2011, Apple spent less than $1 billion on property, plants, and equipment.

By March 2012, the number had spiked beyond $2 billion, beyond $3 billion, and approached $4 billion.

Horace Dediu thinks that number will zoom past $4 billion in 2013.

Here’s a chart he made to show what the spike looks like so far:

 

Apple Spike

Asymco

AAPLDec 13 02:20PM
526.03
Change

-12.97

% Change

-2.41%

 

Here’s the the interesting part about all this massive spending.

No one outside of Apple knows where it’s going.

“The capital is being deployed almost silently and, though vast in scale, barely gets a mention from analysts,” writes Dediu. “Not even a single question has been raised at any earnings call about this spending.”

His theory is that Apple, which prefers an “integrated” approach in everything it does, will soon make more of the components inside its gadgets, like chips.

That would explain why Apple has been so busy hiring former Texas Instruments employees, for example.

The truth is, Apple is a very secret company and it doesn’t have to say, specifically, where it’s spending that money.

For all we know, it could be building TV set factories.

One thing we know for sure is that Apple is always working on products that would cannibalize its current lineup. 

Maybe Apple is investing billions in a product that could kill the iPhone, like computerized glasses.

What do you think ?

Chesapeake Energy : Miserable Results And AMP Predicts More To Come

Christmas Lights Display at Chesapeake Energy ...

Christmas Lights Display at Chesapeake Energy Corporation (Photo credit: tomfs)

Chesapeake  Energy  

Nov. 5

CHK  $ 18.48

We are not fans – and the results confirm CHK as the poster boy for natural gas producers and poor managment.

Chesapeake Energy reported a $2 billion loss in its third quarter as it continues to struggle with low natural gas prices, mounting debt and weak cash flow.

The company also announced Q3 production of 4,142 Mmcfepd,largely due to liquids production. Excluding one- time items, EPS was $0.12, below Gerdes’ $0.15 estimate due to higher DD& A – partially offset by lower operating expences.higher liquids production and high liquids price realization.

Management said it expects to spend $8.75 billion on drilling this year, $250 million more than the maximum it had previously projected. It also lowered its planned spending on leasing drilling rights by $250 million, to $1.75 billion this year. Looking at the balance sheet, Chesapeake’s debt rose to $16 billion in the quarter from $14.3 billion, though the company did reaffirm its pledge to reduce debt to $9.54 billion.

 

 

 

Chesapeake Dealing but Canadian Nat Gas Producers Accepting $ 1.85

Chesapeake Energy Capital Classic

Chesapeake Energy Capital Classic (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

April 11

THESIS:

There is an increasing  ( and WRONG  ) chorus of investors wanting to gamble on a nat gas bottom and Chesapeake in particular. Nat Gas prices are hurting the sector and producers are indicating the low prices may get even worse. Chesapeake continues to sell interests to keep its cash flowing .

Chesapeake Energy announced three deals late Monday that will raise a total of $2.6 billion in cash, as it looks to cover off an anticipated funding shortfall alter this year. Chesapeake struck a $745-million natural gas production deal with an affiliate of Morgan Stanley (MS)

.In that deal, called a volumetric production payment (VPP), Chesapeake receives cash up front for future oil and gas production in a 10-year agreement linked to some of the company’s reserves and assets in the Granite Wash in Oklahoma. In another transaction, Chesapeake sold $1.25 billion of preferred shares in a subsidiary called CHK Cleveland Tonkawa LLC. The purchasers were led by an affiliate of the Blackstone Group (BX)  and included private equity firms TPG Capital and EIG Global Energy Partners.

Finally, the company will sell 58,400 acres in Oklahoma to a subsidiary of ExxonMobil (XOM) for $590 million.  

The company should reduce debt by ~$2 billion in 2012, given ~$10 billion in divestiture proceeds, ~$4 billion in operating  cash flow and ~$12 billion in capital spending/leasehold acquisition. One analyst has high confidence the company achieves at least   the low end of its “$6-8 billion in additional asset sale proceeds” as the Permian alone should garner ~$8 billion assuming ~$3,000/acre and a $100,000/Boe flowing rate multiple. Additionally, he believes Chesapeake should monetize ~$2 billion in midstream/oilfield service/miscellaneous assets this year.

Canadian Producers Are Facing The Music ( The AMP Follows UP by Avoiding Most Of The Nat Gas Focused Names)

As gas prices waver just above the $2 mark, investors have been indiscriminately selling off any and all stock with gas exposure. As selling pressure mounts, hedging programs have come into focus, prompting several companies to update investors on their hedging programs.

Late Monday, Advantage Oil & Gas announced that it added collars on ~50% of its H2/12 gas production with a floor of C$1.85/Mcf and a ceiling of C$2.70/Mcf. It has protected a good level of production beginning in May at $1.85 but given away upside on nearly half its forecast volumes at $2.70. This supports a bearish view for gas prices over the near term.

Also noteworthy is that Progress Energy was active in Q1 adding summer hedges for this year (Q2-Q3) on about 30% of its forecast gas volumes at ~C$2.40/Mcf.

ARC Resources also added to its gas protection for 2012 with an additional 80 MMcf/d of NYMEX gas hedges in Q2-Q4 (it blended into its existing hedge book but average swap price on the incremental volumes appears to be between US$2.50-US$3/Mcf). ARC also added ~40 MMcf/d in 2013 with a US$3.25-4.00 collar. Importantly, a Bay Street analyst notes that ARX, Bellatrix Exploration (BXE), and Peyto Exploration (PEY) have the largest proportion of downside protection, while Birchcliff (BIR), Fairborne Energy (FEL), Paramount Resources (POU) , and Bonavista Energy (BNP)  have zero or limited downside protection.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,175 other followers